[db-wg] Action item 47.2: Proposal for Adding Abuse Contact

On 13 Apr 2004, at 17:23, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote:

>   This simple counting approach is potentially VERY misleading,

Sure.  That's why I took care to call it a starting point! 8-)

>   as it is
>   not the sheer _number_ of individual entries which should be counted,
>   but the _size_ of the address blocks covered in this hierarchy.

Fine.  So ALL the numbers can be scaled down.  Does the scaling affect 
the
different methods I suggested (or others: I'm sure someone must have 
better
concrete ideas?) differently, or similarly ?

>   On top of that, there's the possibiltiy to use the hierarchy to e.g.
>   provide a "1st-line" contact for an individual address block AND a
>   fallback or upstream for the encompassing block.

Again, does this skew the argument, or just scale everything down in
proportion ?

Best regards,
Niall