[db-wg] Action item 47.2: Proposal for Adding Abuse Contact

>As a starting point, let's take (approximations to) MarcoH's RIPE-47 
>statistics.
>
>Number of inet[6]num objects:
>			10**6
>Number of inet[6]num objects with IRT:
>			10**3 (not significant)

  This simple counting approach is potentially VERY misleading, as it is
  not the sheer _number_ of individual entries which should be counted,
  but the _size_ of the address blocks covered in this hierarchy.

  On top of that, there's the possibiltiy to use the hierarchy to e.g.
  provide a "1st-line" contact for an individual address block AND a
  fallback or upstream for the encompassing block.

  Marco, would it be reasonably easy for you to extract this additional
  piece of statistics data?

  Wilfried.