[db-wg] Action item 47.2: Proposal for Adding Abuse Contact

On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 06:23:24PM +0200, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote:
> >As a starting point, let's take (approximations to) MarcoH's RIPE-47 
> >statistics.
> >
> >Number of inet[6]num objects:
> >			10**6
> >Number of inet[6]num objects with IRT:
> >			10**3 (not significant)
> 
>   This simple counting approach is potentially VERY misleading, as it is
>   not the sheer _number_ of individual entries which should be counted,
>   but the _size_ of the address blocks covered in this hierarchy.
> 
>   On top of that, there's the possibiltiy to use the hierarchy to e.g.
>   provide a "1st-line" contact for an individual address block AND a
>   fallback or upstream for the encompassing block.
> 
>   Marco, would it be reasonably easy for you to extract this additional
>   piece of statistics data?

Sure, although it will probably take some time as I'm kinda busy these
days.

To be sure, last meeting I had the count on the number of inet(6)num
objects having a mnt-irt and the number having a remarks: *abuse*
attribute.

The request is to extend this on the actual number of IP-addresses covered
by both methods ? I will try to extend my script (grep | wc -l) a bit to
get this info, hopefully during next weekend but at least in time for the
next meeting.

Grtx,

MarcoH