This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects
- Previous message (by thread): [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects
- Next message (by thread): [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
David Kessens
david at IPRG.nokia.com
Thu Jun 13 22:57:49 CEST 2002
Geoff, On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 10:02:52PM +1000, Geoff Huston wrote: > > >I tend to agree with Nigel, although I'd go for something even > >plainer like DELEGATED-TO-LIR and ASSIGNED-TO-END-USER (I know > >they're a bit verbose but they're absolutely clear ;-) It also makes > >clear that addresses assigned to an LIR in the role of END-USER are > >exactly that. That way, an individual who is struggling with English > >as a second language (or even their first language ;-) can be > >absolutely clear of the status of a range of addresses. > > For me these two phrases, DELEGATED-TO-LIR and > ASSIGNED-TO-END-USER, hit the spot precisely! > > excellent suggestion Guy! > > Is it appropriate to request consideration of these terms as replacements > for ASSIGNED and ALLOCATED? I would like to second such a request. ASSIGNED and ALLOCATED seem to be confusing terms, even for the professionals in this business. David K. ---
- Previous message (by thread): [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects
- Next message (by thread): [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]