This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
[apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects
- Previous message (by thread): [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects
- Next message (by thread): [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Geoff Huston
gih at telstra.net
Wed Jun 12 14:02:52 CEST 2002
>I tend to agree with Nigel, although I'd go for something even >plainer like DELEGATED-TO-LIR and ASSIGNED-TO-END-USER (I know >they're a bit verbose but they're absolutely clear ;-) It also makes >clear that addresses assigned to an LIR in the role of END-USER are >exactly that. That way, an individual who is struggling with English >as a second language (or even their first language ;-) can be >absolutely clear of the status of a range of addresses. For me these two phrases, DELEGATED-TO-LIR and ASSIGNED-TO-END-USER, hit the spot precisely! excellent suggestion Guy! Is it appropriate to request consideration of these terms as replacements for ASSIGNED and ALLOCATED? Geoff
- Previous message (by thread): [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects
- Next message (by thread): [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]