This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/

[apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects

Previous message (by thread): [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects
Next message (by thread): [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Anne Lord anne at apnic.net
Thu Jun 20 08:31:49 CEST 2002

Hi Geoff,

> For me these two phrases, DELEGATED-TO-LIR and
> ASSIGNED-TO-END-USER, hit the spot precisely!
> 
> excellent suggestion Guy!
> 
> Is it appropriate to request consideration of these terms as replacements
> for ASSIGNED and ALLOCATED?
  
The terms in the database in connection with this attribute are 
used to reflect the existing policy environment. If you wish to change 
the terms, then the appropriate place to do that (in the AP region) is 
the Address Policy SIG. You are very welcome to make a proposal there. 

cheers,

Anne
--

Previous message (by thread): [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects
Next message (by thread): [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]