This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects
- Previous message (by thread): [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects
- Next message (by thread): [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Pekka Savola
pekkas at netcore.fi
Wed Jun 12 14:06:15 CEST 2002
On 12 Jun 2002, Nigel Titley wrote: > On Wed, 2002-06-12 at 13:00, Robert Kiessling wrote: > > Daniel Karrenberg <Daniel.Karrenberg at ripe.net> writes: > > > > > This is an excellent idea. However I would use > > > ALLOCATED_TO_LIR and ASSIGNED_TO_END_USER. > > > That way we clarify the subtle difference while > > > maintaining consistency with existing documentation. > > > > This is still missing a status for allocations done by LIRs to someone > > Don't you mean assignments? :-) > > > who is neither LIR nor end user ("NLA"). > > Examples? (I'm probably just being stupid) Small ISP which has neither resources or the need to be a LIR. (One that might need, say, /40 with HD80%) -- Pekka Savola "Tell me of difficulties surmounted, Netcore Oy not those you stumble over and fall" Systems. Networks. Security. -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords
- Previous message (by thread): [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects
- Next message (by thread): [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]