This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/

[apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects

• Previous message (by thread): [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects
• Next message (by thread): [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Robert Kiessling Robert.Kiessling at de.easynet.net
Wed Jun 12 15:17:52 CEST 2002

Nigel Titley <nigel at titley.com> writes:

> > This is still missing a status for allocations done by LIRs to someone
> 
> Don't you mean assignments? :-)

No.

> > who is neither LIR nor end user ("NLA").
> 
> Examples? (I'm probably just being stupid)

5.3 of the 2002-04-25 draft: "LIR-to-ISP allocation". LIRs are free to
suballocate the allocation they got from a RIR. Such a suballocation
is neither an assignment nor a RIR-allocation, so should get a
separate status attribute (as found in the original proposal).

Robert

• Previous message (by thread): [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects
• Next message (by thread): [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]