This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/

[apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects

• Previous message (by thread): [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects
• Next message (by thread): [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Nigel Titley nigel at titley.com
Wed Jun 12 14:54:41 CEST 2002

On Wed, 2002-06-12 at 13:00, Robert Kiessling wrote:
> Daniel Karrenberg <Daniel.Karrenberg at ripe.net> writes:
> 
> > This is an excellent idea. However I would use 
> > ALLOCATED_TO_LIR and ASSIGNED_TO_END_USER.
> > That way we clarify the subtle difference while
> > maintaining consistency with existing documentation.
> 
> This is still missing a status for allocations done by LIRs to someone

Don't you mean assignments? :-)

> who is neither LIR nor end user ("NLA").

Examples? (I'm probably just being stupid)

• Previous message (by thread): [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects
• Next message (by thread): [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]