This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[cooperation-wg] Data Retention Directive considered harmful
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Data Retention Directive considered harmful
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Data Retention Directive considered harmful
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gordon Lennox
gordon.lennox.13 at gmail.com
Tue Apr 8 16:17:15 CEST 2014
On 8 Apr, 2014, at 14:28, Patrik Fältström <paf at frobbit.se> wrote: > that information MUST be deleted when it is not needed anymore Or maybe more: personal information should be deleted or anonymised when it is no longer required for the specific purpose the individual originally agreed too. So no long-term archiving and no re-use for non-related purposes. But yes. This will be messy. Even post-Snoden. And even if we see stories like this: http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-26936116 On the bright side it could make implementing carrier-grade NATs so much more fun. Gordon See also: http://www.privacysurgeon.org/blog/incision/european-court-rules-mass-surveillance-of-communications-unlawful/
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Data Retention Directive considered harmful
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Data Retention Directive considered harmful
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]