[cooperation-wg] Data Retention Directive considered harmful

We should remember that the Directive is in reality an exception to the base rule that is that information MUST be deleted when it is not needed anymore. Neither the ones that want more data retained nor the ones that is against data to be retained like the Directive.

Opening it can because of that be viewed as a success for both(!) sides.

The ones being AGAINST the directive, they see an ability to make it more clear what is to be retained and not together with shortening the time data is retained (up to including "quick freeze").

The ones being IN FAVOR of the directive are happy because they see it being possible to include in the new version also other kinds of communication than what is in the directive today.

Etc.

    Patrik

On 8 apr 2014, at 12:24, mariann unterluggauer <mariann at nomatic.org> wrote:

> patrik,
> can you be more specific?¿
> 
> thanks!
> mariann
> 
> 
> On Apr 8, 2014, at 11:39 AM, Patrik Fältström <paf at frobbit.se> wrote:
> 
>> On 8 apr 2014, at 11:09, Nick Hilliard <nick at inex.ie> wrote:
>> 
>>>> http://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2014-04/cp140054en.pdf
>>> 
>>> enjoy.
>> 
>> Exactly what both opponents and proponents of the directive wanted.
>> 
>> This will be messy...
>> 
>>  Patrik
>> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/cooperation-wg/attachments/20140408/4be75968/attachment.sig>