This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/cooperation-wg@ripe.net/
[cooperation-wg] Data Retention Directive considered harmful
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Data Retention Directive considered harmful
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Data Retention Directive considered harmful
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Tue Apr 8 17:18:50 CEST 2014
On 8 Apr 2014, at 15:17, Gordon Lennox <gordon.lennox.13 at gmail.com> wrote: > On the bright side it could make implementing carrier-grade NATs so much more fun. Or perhaps it'll be the tipping point for carriers to deploy IPv6. :-) Says he both ducking for cover and running away...
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Data Retention Directive considered harmful
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Data Retention Directive considered harmful
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]