Re: Children of ORBS
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 14:12:54 +0200
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 01:24:37PM +0200, Jesus Sanz de las Heras. CSIC/RedIRIS wrote:
>
> I'm surprised with ORBZ and its new concept of multi-stage relay. Is a
> good iniciative but for now I'm scared to use it.
Isn't it the same concept that ORBS implemented?
It is hardly a new concept. Incidentally, multistage open relays
are also handled by MAPS: they go into RBL.
> What do you think about these new black lists? Some of you are using
> them ?
>
> http://www.ordb.org
> http://www.orbz.org
> http://www.orbl.orb
Note that ORBL corresponds to an "output" zone, while ORDB
corresponds to an "input" zone. So ORBL is more aggressive
than ORDB in terms of policy; however ORDB is more aggressive
in the search for open relays, and in fact is now well over
100,000.
I do not have direct experience with any of them. We are
MAPS subscribers and stick with them, but the real primary reason
for staying with RSS/RBL for open relay blocking is the requirement
of actual spam samples by MAPS. They are very useful to us, when
explaining the reason for a block to a non-technical person (a
customer of us, or his/her correspondant using the open relay).
Still, using RSS takes significant human resources to an ISP
and we do a lot of whitelisting on a systematic basis
in order to be able to continue with it.
furio ercolessi
Spin