[anti-abuse-wg] Seeking Input on the Future of the Anti-Abuse Working Group

Hi Leo

It's more about sharpening the focus. I colored this red below. I feel 
eventually the RIPE NCC must adapt stronger policies to punish 
non-action or disregard of action. I think it would be better if this WG 
comes up with such policies which the RIPE NCC can then adopt (or not) 
rather than the RIPE NCC having to react to external pressure, e.g. from 
policy makers, in particular the EU. I'm sure one can formulate this 
much better. I firmly believe, that there is no way around stronger 
regulation, and I'd much rather see this coming from this community than 
form the outside. The regulators i see and work with are increasingly 
irritated and react with totally inadequate demands, which I wont 
reproduce here.

 1. Identifying and analyzing emerging security threats and
    vulnerabilities affecting Internet infrastructure.
 2. Collaborating with stakeholders, in particular the RIPE community,
    to develop and advocate and implement best practices, guidelines,
    and standards for securing Internet resources.
 3. Facilitating information sharing and cooperation among network
    operators, law enforcement, and relevant entities to mitigate
    security risks.
 4. Providing education, training, and outreach initiatives to raise
    awareness of security issues and promote best practices adoption.
 5. Develop policies recommendations to the RIPE NCC that help enforcing
    good behavior and sanction disregard for faccepted security
    standards. This includes the definition of acceptable minimal
    standards.

Best regards
Serge

On 09.05.24 21:39, Leo Vegoda wrote:
> Hi Serge,
>
> On Thu, 9 May 2024 at 11:41, Serge Droz via anti-abuse-wg
> <anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net>  wrote:
>> Hi Leo
>>
>> We can only recommend the community, obviously.
> I agree.
>
>> So these aare the best
>> practices
>>
>> We can recommend that RIPE NCC changes its rules and procedures to
>> address certain issues.
>>
>> As a WG, if I'm correct we have no other power.
> Based on thisl, I don't understand what's missing from the draft text.
> Maybe you could suggest some specific edits?
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Leo

-- 
Dr. Serge Droz
Member, FIRST Board of Directors
https://www.first.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20240510/263c6729/attachment.html>