[anti-abuse-wg] Seeking Input on the Future of the Anti-Abuse Working Group

And includes much more due diligence in IP allocation and membership procedures, hopefully


--srs
________________________________
From: anti-abuse-wg <anti-abuse-wg-bounces at ripe.net> on behalf of Serge Droz via anti-abuse-wg <anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net>
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2024 11:51:13 AM
To: anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net <anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net>
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Seeking Input on the Future of the Anti-Abuse Working Group


Hi Leo

It's more about sharpening the focus. I colored this red below. I feel eventually the RIPE NCC must adapt stronger policies to punish non-action or disregard of action. I think it would be better if this WG comes up with such policies which the RIPE NCC can then adopt (or not) rather than the RIPE NCC having to react to external pressure, e.g. from policy makers, in particular the EU. I'm sure one can formulate this much better. I firmly believe, that there is no way around stronger regulation, and I'd much rather see this coming from this community than form the outside. The regulators i see and work with are increasingly irritated and react with totally inadequate demands, which I wont reproduce here.

  1.  Identifying and analyzing emerging security threats and vulnerabilities affecting Internet infrastructure.
  2.  Collaborating with stakeholders, in particular the RIPE community, to develop and advocate and implement best practices, guidelines, and standards for securing Internet resources.
  3.  Facilitating information sharing and cooperation among network operators, law enforcement, and relevant entities to mitigate security risks.
  4.  Providing education, training, and outreach initiatives to raise awareness of security issues and promote best practices adoption.
  5.  Develop policies recommendations to the RIPE NCC that help enforcing good behavior and sanction disregard for faccepted security standards. This includes the definition of acceptable minimal standards.

Best regards
Serge

On 09.05.24 21:39, Leo Vegoda wrote:

Hi Serge,

On Thu, 9 May 2024 at 11:41, Serge Droz via anti-abuse-wg
<anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net><mailto:anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net> wrote:



Hi Leo

We can only recommend the community, obviously.



I agree.



So these aare the best
practices

We can recommend that RIPE NCC changes its rules and procedures to
address certain issues.

As a WG, if I'm correct we have no other power.



Based on thisl, I don't understand what's missing from the draft text.
Maybe you could suggest some specific edits?

Kind regards,

Leo


--
Dr. Serge Droz
Member, FIRST Board of Directors
https://www.first.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20240510/cb159e60/attachment-0001.html>