This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Michele Neylon - Blacknight
michele at blacknight.com
Thu Nov 2 10:42:49 CET 2023
Gert I think a lot of us were not going to accept ANY changes to the charging scheme that time round. Anyway .. history now .. Michele -- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains https://www.blacknight.com/ https://blacknight.blog/ Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 Personal blog: https://michele.blog/ Some thoughts: https://ceo.hosting/ ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland Company No.: 370845 I have sent this email at a time that is convenient for me. I do not expect you to respond to it outside of your usual working hours. On 02/11/2023, 10:39, "Gert Doering" <gert at space.net> wrote: Hi, On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 09:29:52AM +0000, Michele Neylon - Blacknight wrote: > The ASN cost for us would have had practically no impact ? we only have two and I suspect we?re getting rid of one at some point. > > However the other costs that the charging schemes suggested would have cost us thousands ? and that simply wasn?t acceptable ASN charges yes/no were their own voting item, fully independent on the charging scheme A/B/C/D vote. (Resolution 4 vs. Resolution 3) https://www.ripe.net/participate/meetings/gm/meetings/may-2023/draft-minutes-of-the-general-meeting-may-2023 But maybe the question itself was loaded and biased... "Resolution 4: "In addition to the RIPE NCC Charging Scheme adopted in Resolution 3, the General Meeting adopts an extra charge of EUR 50 per ASN as an integral part of the Charging Scheme 2024." naming this an "extra charge" *without* being very clear that it's not going to change the overall budget (= by implication, the individual charges on model A, B, C, D need to become lower) does, indeed, suggest that it will be "more expensive". *sigh* Time for retirement, Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20231102/bdd16b07/attachment-0001.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]