[anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?

Hi,

On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 09:29:52AM +0000, Michele Neylon - Blacknight wrote:
> The ASN cost for us would have had practically no impact ? we only have two and I suspect we?re getting rid of one at some point.
> 
> However the other costs that the charging schemes suggested would have cost us thousands ? and that simply wasn?t acceptable

ASN charges yes/no were their own voting item, fully independent on
the charging scheme A/B/C/D vote.

(Resolution 4 vs. Resolution 3)

https://www.ripe.net/participate/meetings/gm/meetings/may-2023/draft-minutes-of-the-general-meeting-may-2023


But maybe the question itself was loaded and biased...

 "Resolution 4:

  "In addition to the RIPE NCC Charging Scheme adopted in Resolution 3,
   the General Meeting adopts an extra charge of EUR 50 per ASN as an
   integral part of the Charging Scheme 2024."

naming this an "extra charge" *without* being very clear that it's not
going to change the overall budget (= by implication, the individual
charges on model A, B, C, D need to become lower) does, indeed, 
suggest that it will be "more expensive".

*sigh*

Time for retirement,

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20231102/8713f7e8/attachment.sig>