[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")

On 18 May 2019, at 9:38, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via anti-abuse-wg wrote:

> El 18/5/19 10:35, "Gert Doering" <gert at space.net> escribió:
>
>     I have an idea.
>
>     I will set up a service where everyone can have an e-mail address 
> which
>     will totally follow everything you propose as validation mechanism 
> - like,
>     click on tokes, report back in 10 minutes (even in the middle of 
> the
>     night), etc. - LIRs that want to be spared this annoyance can just 
> pay
>     me 50 EUR/month, and I'll handle all these chores for them.
>
>     So, this would totally fulfill your proposed policy, and not help 
> in any
>     bit with *abuse handling*.
>
> That automated system will be against the policy. I've already worded 
> it out in such way that is not possible this type of "work-around the 
> policy", at least it was my original intent to avoid it.

I wonder how words can make anything impossible.

I also wonder how to implement a dependable Turing Test for 
distinguishing
between what Gert suggests ( a kind of "Mechanical Turk") and a real 
human.

Just saying.

Niall