This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
jordi.palet at consulintel.es
Sat May 18 19:08:52 CEST 2019
El 18/5/19 18:49, "anti-abuse-wg en nombre de Niall O'Reilly" <anti-abuse-wg-bounces at ripe.net en nombre de niall.oreilly at ucd.ie> escribió: On 18 May 2019, at 9:38, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via anti-abuse-wg wrote: > El 18/5/19 10:35, "Gert Doering" <gert at space.net> escribió: > > I have an idea. > > I will set up a service where everyone can have an e-mail address > which > will totally follow everything you propose as validation mechanism > - like, > click on tokes, report back in 10 minutes (even in the middle of > the > night), etc. - LIRs that want to be spared this annoyance can just > pay > me 50 EUR/month, and I'll handle all these chores for them. > > So, this would totally fulfill your proposed policy, and not help > in any > bit with *abuse handling*. > > That automated system will be against the policy. I've already worded > it out in such way that is not possible this type of "work-around the > policy", at least it was my original intent to avoid it. I wonder how words can make anything impossible. I also wonder how to implement a dependable Turing Test for distinguishing between what Gert suggests ( a kind of "Mechanical Turk") and a real human. Obviously all what we have in our policies is not bullet proof (and you could fake almost every rule that we have), but that doesn't mean that if you don't follow policies and it is discovered you're not violating them. Same in law. Nobody is looking that you follow law at 100%, but if you don't do, is your own decision and may have consequences. I said this already several times. Don't having agreed reasonable rules that need to be followed will be like not need for having RIRs and being in the wild-west. Just saying. Niall ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.theipv6company.com The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]