This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Proposal 2019-03 BGP Hijacking
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Proposal 2019-03 BGP Hijacking
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Proposal 2019-03 BGP Hijacking
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at foobar.org
Sat Mar 30 15:27:00 CET 2019
Carlos Friaças via anti-abuse-wg wrote on 30/03/2019 09:17: > Perhaps one of the Chairs can shed some light. Hi Carlos, The approach by most if not all RIPE working groups is set out in rfc7282: "On Consensus and Humming in the IETF". It's worth reading this document carefully to understand the process by which consensus is attained, section 6 in particular: "One hundred people for and five people against might not be rough consensus". Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Proposal 2019-03 BGP Hijacking
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Proposal 2019-03 BGP Hijacking
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]