[anti-abuse-wg] Proposal 2019-03 BGP Hijacking

Hi Sergey,

 

I think this is a completely different discussion and up to the chairs the PDP decision process, as we all know.

 

However, I want to point out, that from my perspective, supporting voices are perfectly valid, regardless of pointing out their motivations or not. This is my take on consensus.

 

On the other way around, non-supporting ones need to be motivated.

 

I agree that if I’m a proposal author (not speaking now about this one), and have more friends that somebody opposing and I convince all my friends to support it, is not fair. However, if those supporting voices aren’t “friends”, but colleagues working in the same area of work, and suffering the same problems as myself, it is fine asking them to support it.

 

I will love that all the policy proposals have this kind of support (or non-support), it makes easy for authors to improve the proposals, and I guess, to chairs to decide (even if it means extra work to track all the discussions).


Regards,

Jordi

 

 

 

El 29/3/19 23:01, "anti-abuse-wg en nombre de Sergey Myasoedov via anti-abuse-wg" <anti-abuse-wg-bounces at ripe.net en nombre de anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net> escribió:

 

Dear group members from Portugal stated your support for 2019-03,

 

Can you please provide some more arguments than your humble "+1" statement? This is a working group, not a voting.

 

Please.

 

 

--

Kind regards,

Sergey Myasoedov



On 29 Mar 2019, at 18:33, Vitor Leitao <vitor.m.leitao at gmail.com> wrote:

 

I would like to manifest my support to the proposal 2019-03.

 

Rgds,

 

Vitor Leitao

 



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20190330/8eee789a/attachment.html>