[anti-abuse-wg] Proposal 2019-03 BGP Hijacking

On Sat, Mar 30, 2019, 10:23 AM Carlos Friaças via anti-abuse-wg <
anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net> wrote:

> Do supporters need to specify which parts of the proposal's text are more
> meaningful for them?
>
> Perhaps one of the Chairs can shed some light.
>

They in fact have done that before. To quote:

---- start ----

From: *Brian Nisbet* <brian.nisbet at heanet.ie>
Date: Mon, Mar 25, 2019, 10:12 AM
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is
a RIPE Policy Violation)

[..] To clarify, the discussion on this proposal is a discussion, not a
vote. When judging consensus the Co-Chairs will look at the points made
during the discussion, not count the +1s. Of course it is useful to get a
feeling for general agreement, so simple statements of support or dissent
are very useful, but they are not the core of the thing.

---- end ----

--
Töma

>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20190330/f0dd6b64/attachment.html>