[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 and over-reach

On 23/03/2019 13:31, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via anti-abuse-wg wrote on 22/03/2019 22:55:
>> The legal bindings of the NCC already have that for those that don’t 
>> follow existing policies, don’t pay bills, etc. So, the proposal is 
>> adding in the table a policy for confirming what is a hijack 
>> according to the community consensus. Same way we did for how we 
>> distribute resources, do transfers, etc.
>
> Hi Jordi,
>
> couple of things:
>
> 1. it's not the job of the RIPE NCC to make up for a short-fall of 
> civil legislation in this area, no matter how distasteful we might 
> find the consequences of this;
Purity of concept will result in massive gov't intervention since we 
will have shown that we don't know how to self-regulate.
The voices are already there:
https://hackernoon.com/why-the-internet-must-be-regulated-9d65031e7491
If you have an alternative solution, not even a better one, please 
suggest it.

Regards,
Hank