This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
jordi.palet at consulintel.es
Wed Mar 20 09:05:01 CET 2019
Hi Hank, El 20/3/19 8:53, "anti-abuse-wg en nombre de Hank Nussbacher" <anti-abuse-wg-bounces at ripe.net en nombre de hank at efes.iucc.ac.il> escribió: On Wed, 20 Mar 2019, Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 09:06:11AM +0200, Hank Nussbacher wrote: >> On Tue, 19 Mar 2019, Marco Schmidt wrote: >> >> More or less I agree with the proposal. But what happens after a LIR is >> found to be violation of the policy? RIPE NCC puts out a statement "LIR X >> is in violation of Policy nnnn"? So what? How does this policy assist >> stopping the BGP hijack from taking place, even if it takes 1-2 months to >> handle the paperwork? > > Well, that's a subtle twist of the proposal not actually spelled out - a > LIR found to be in violation of RIPE policies is breaking their contract > with the NCC (the SSA) and as such can be closed and their resources > withdrawn. > > So that's a fairly effective way to sanction abusive behaviour. The amount of time that will transpire from the time of abuse and a LIR closed and their resources withdrawn can well be in excess of a year if not two years. Is that the end result we are looking for? If we believe that this is an excessive period of time, we can always draft another policy that allows reclaiming resources in case of policy violation in a faster way. In LACNIC there is one for that, I think following that policy will take less than 6 months, and of course than can be improved/tailored to our wishes as a community. However, I think it is a separated discussion. Regards, Jordi -Hank > > (I haven't decided whether I think this is going to work or do harm, so > I'm not voicing support or opposition on the proposal itself) > > Gert Doering > -- NetMaster > ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.theipv6company.com The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]