This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg at tristatelogic.com
Wed Mar 20 21:05:14 CET 2019
In message <alpine.LRH.2.21.1903201011190.23614 at noc.ilan.net.il>, Hank Nussbacher <hank at efes.iucc.ac.il> wrote: >I view the criminals >as ones who analyze every RFC and every standard to determine where they >can be abused or manipulated for their benefit. A sanction that would be >implemented 18 months later would allow the evil LIR enough time to sell >their resources to some other LIR such that they would not lose such >resources. That's a good (and non-obvious) point! So, during any "review" process for any accused/alleged hijacker, the resources of that (alleged) hijacker must be frozen... with respect to transfers... until the matter has been adjudicated, one way or the other. Regards, rfg
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]