[anti-abuse-wg] Defining routing abuse

In message <CALZ3u+YhuC1-nho1bt6Wtj88P4PQXYkNnSevKASO_NrVmb0POA at mail.gmail.com>,
=?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=B6ma_Gavrichenkov?= <ximaera at gmail.com> wrote:

>Peace,
>
>This is to continue the discussion around 2019-03. Here's our today's
>article about the ways some operators do traffic engineering:
>https://radar.qrator.net/blog/new-hijack-attack-in-the-wild
>
>Should that also be treated as a policy violation? This is clearly intentional.

The answer, I think, should depend only on the answers to two key questions:

1)  Was the routing done with the knowledge and consent of the prefix owner(s)?

2)  If not, then was the routing withdrawn promptly when the route originator
was notified that he/she/it was doing something wrong?