This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Defining routing abuse
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Defining routing abuse
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Defining routing abuse
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Töma Gavrichenkov
ximaera at gmail.com
Fri Apr 12 20:29:33 CEST 2019
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 9:16 PM Ronald F. Guilmette <rfg at tristatelogic.com> wrote: > The answer, I think, should depend only on the answers to two key questions: > > 1) Was the routing done with the knowledge and consent of the prefix owner(s)? This is the tricky part. Routing — yes. *Deaggregation* — no. -- Töma
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Defining routing abuse
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Defining routing abuse
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]