[anti-abuse-wg] Defining routing abuse

Hi,


On Fri, 12 Apr 2019, Töma Gavrichenkov wrote:

> Peace,
>
> This is to continue the discussion around 2019-03. Here's our today's
> article about the ways some operators do traffic engineering:
> https://radar.qrator.net/blog/new-hijack-attack-in-the-wild
>
> Should that also be treated as a policy violation? This is clearly intentional.


First question that comes to mind is:
Would you be willing to become one of the experts in a voluntary experts 
pool? -- if 2019-03 happens to get somewhere, obviously...


Second question:
Is the policy violation emerging from AS263444 to be treated as a policy 
violation?
(if i read well your article, i would say "yes")


Third question:
Is this overloading of rogue ASNs on your prefix's AS_PATH something that 
should also be considered a violation?

(i really don't have an answer for that...)


Thanks.


Regards,
Carlos

ps: will forward this to the LACNIC list.


> --
> Töma
>