This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse - preamble
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse - preamble
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse - preamble
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Mon Aug 29 06:40:34 CEST 2016
On 29/08/16, 9:52 AM, "anti-abuse-wg on behalf of ox" <anti-abuse-wg-bounces at ripe.net on behalf of andre at ox.co.za> wrote: > We are discussing Internet Abuse - and, to be clear – I > still have no idea what you are talking about. Your diatribe > makes no sense and I am giving up trying to figure out what > it means as it is simply too much effort. So far this subthread has been a case of the blind leading the blind, but Marilson is indeed correct here. Your definition of abuse (for all that it can be defined in the overly narrow sense you are trying to bog the discussion down into) will not stand. If you have any colleagues that actually do abuse policy enforcement and network security, feel free to talk to them. --srs
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse - preamble
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse - preamble
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]