[anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse - preamble

On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 10:10:34 +0530
Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 29/08/16, 9:52 AM, "anti-abuse-wg on behalf of ox"
> <anti-abuse-wg-bounces at ripe.net on behalf of andre at ox.co.za> wrote:
> > We are discussing Internet  Abuse - and, to be clear – I
> > still have no idea what you are talking about. Your diatribe
> > makes no sense and I am giving up trying to figure out what
> > it means as it is simply too much effort.
> 
> So far this subthread has been a case of the blind leading the blind,
> but Marilson is indeed correct here. Your definition of abuse (for
> all that it can be defined in the overly narrow sense you are trying
> to bog the discussion down into) will not stand.
> 
> If you have any colleagues that actually do abuse policy enforcement
> and network security, feel free to talk to them.
> 

The proposed definition of Internet Abuse is not "narrow" ? Please will
you be so kind to help the blind Suresh, and please explain to me how
the proposed definition is "narrow" or exclusive?

To be clear, this is the last definition we were talking about:
"The non sanctioned use of a resource to infringe upon the usage rights
of another resource"

Andre