This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] Brian Krebs posts stophaus chat logs of Spamhaus ddos coordination
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Brian Krebs posts stophaus chat logs of Spamhaus ddos coordination
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Brian Krebs posts stophaus chat logs of Spamhaus ddos coordination
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
ox
andre at ox.co.za
Sat Aug 27 14:47:46 CEST 2016
On Sat, 27 Aug 2016 18:04:53 +0530 Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists at gmail.com> wrote: > The one takeaway i get from this seems to be that the bad guys are > perfectly aware of just where they can find loose or poorly > implemented security and abuse policies - who is incompetent, who is > malicious, who to abuse, who not to abuse > > And action if any gets taken only after significant pressure is > applied. > true... as per the convo - easy to find a .ru upstream, etc. But, it is becoming more obvious that before we can deal with anything properly anyway, we need to be able to properly define what it is. How can anyone expect anyone to implement proper abuse policies if open society cannot even agree, openly, about what internet abuse even is? Andre
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Brian Krebs posts stophaus chat logs of Spamhaus ddos coordination
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Brian Krebs posts stophaus chat logs of Spamhaus ddos coordination
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]