This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse - preamble
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse - preamble
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse - preamble
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gunther Nitzsche
gnitzsche at netcologne.de
Thu Aug 25 16:20:03 CEST 2016
On 08/25/2016 03:36 PM, ox wrote: > On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 15:28:58 +0200 > Gunther Nitzsche <gnitzsche at netcologne.de> wrote: >> On 08/25/2016 02:38 PM, ox wrote: >>> Get it yet? >>> >> No. Sorry. :-( > okay, I will try to explain it better :) > > > Normal bitcoin mining abuse = You --> CPU > > Anyway, Internet abuse same principle One resource --> another resource > > Get it now? I know what you mean, but I don't follow you here. I do not want this restriction and cannot see one reason why you insist on this. >> "If you use my server to do something. " Stop. >> I do not need "another resource". I wonder what arguments >> you have against my suggestion of wording. >> >> I even doubt that the anti-abuse-working-group is limited to >> network based abuse. Entering wrong registration data (let's say by >> FAX) could also be covered by this group though it is not a network >> based abuse. >> > wrong registration data by fax - is not Internet abuse (doubtful if it > even normal or just abuse...) First: I do not know why you also insist on "internet abuse" - I did not see any mention of this restriction in the existing charter of this group Second: It might very well turn into "Internet abuse" i.e. when it comes to find out sources of (other) abuse related actions. If the whois-record is wrong, one could identify this registration fake as abuse. (the severity might vary) So it might be a good idea to have this issue on topic right from the beginning. In your definition a registration fake is no abuse because only one resource is involved *and* because it did not happen via the internet; in my definition it is and it belongs to the topics of this group. We can setup a doodle for this :) As long as we don't hear other opinions on this I step back again .. best greetings, Gunther >> No artificial restrictions please; they might hurt us later on. >> >> NetCologne Systemadministration -- NetCologne Gesellschaft für Telekommunikation mbH Am Coloneum 9 ; 50829 Köln Geschäftsführer: Timo von Lepel, Mario Wilhelm Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Dr. Andreas Cerbe HRB 25580, AG Köln
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse - preamble
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse - preamble
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]