This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] Bye Bye
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Bye Bye
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Bye Bye
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Fri Jun 28 20:00:52 CEST 2013
The access side is about the largest adopter of whatever IP connectivity works for them wih a minimum of effort. So decisions will vary across providers, sure. On Friday, June 28, 2013, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Jun 28, Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists at gmail.com <javascript:;>> > wrote: > > > There has been little or no reason to adopt v6 so far, other than as an > I have a great reason: I am out of v4 addresses and I want to turn up > new customers. > > > With some majors like Google starting to adopt it, and with only a few > > years left for a v4 aftermarket, carrier grade nat etc to have any > effect, > There is no noticeable v4 market and NAT is only relevant on the access > side. I don't do access. > > -- > ciao, > Marco > -- --srs (iPad) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20130628/1a9b7679/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Bye Bye
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Bye Bye
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]