This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Bye Bye
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Bye Bye
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Bye Bye
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marco d'Itri
md at Linux.IT
Fri Jun 28 18:49:57 CEST 2013
On Jun 28, Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists at gmail.com> wrote: > There has been little or no reason to adopt v6 so far, other than as an I have a great reason: I am out of v4 addresses and I want to turn up new customers. > With some majors like Google starting to adopt it, and with only a few > years left for a v4 aftermarket, carrier grade nat etc to have any effect, There is no noticeable v4 market and NAT is only relevant on the access side. I don't do access. -- ciao, Marco -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20130628/a7db7ae7/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Bye Bye
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Bye Bye
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]