The access side is about the largest adopter of whatever IP connectivity works for them wih a minimum of effort. So decisions will vary across providers, sure. On Friday, June 28, 2013, Marco d'Itri wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On Jun 28, Suresh Ramasubramanian <<a href="javascript:;" onclick="_e(event, 'cvml', 'ops.lists@gmail.com')">ops.lists@gmail.com</a>> wrote: > There has been little or no reason to adopt v6 so far, other than as an I have a great reason: I am out of v4 addresses and I want to turn up new customers. > With some majors like Google starting to adopt it, and with only a few > years left for a v4 aftermarket, carrier grade nat etc to have any effect, There is no noticeable v4 market and NAT is only relevant on the access side. I don't do access. -- ciao, Marco </blockquote> -- --srs (iPad)