This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck
lists-ripe at c4inet.net
Thu Jun 20 15:10:15 CEST 2013
Hi Brian, On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 01:08:03PM +0100, Brian Nisbet wrote: >The second may be that while these companies may be legitimate >businesses the NCC is aware of the local law and says, "Ah, no, we >know, for a fact, that you are mandated to use these resources for >network abuse, therefore your application is invalid." Hmmm. That raises an interesting question: What *does* the NCC consider "network abuse" and grounds to deny an, otherwise legitimate, request? I was not aware that the RAs even have this option... rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]