[anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website

Sascha Luck wrote the following on 20/06/2013 14:10:
> Hi Brian,
>
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 01:08:03PM +0100, Brian Nisbet wrote:
>> The second may be that while these companies may be legitimate
>> businesses the NCC is aware of the local law and says, "Ah, no, we
>> know, for a fact, that you are mandated to use these resources for
>> network abuse, therefore your application is invalid."
>
> Hmmm. That raises an interesting question: What *does* the NCC
> consider "network abuse" and grounds to deny an, otherwise legitimate,
> request? I was not aware that the RAs even have this option...

Please note the word "may". We're still talking hypotheticals and I 
doubt this would be the decision of just one IPRA. I would also not 
presume to speak for the NCC.

Brian