This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] Clarification Regarding Needs Assessment and Audits
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Clarification Regarding Needs Assessment and Audits
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Clarification Regarding Needs Assessment and Audits
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Sat Aug 31 01:11:18 CEST 2013
I was starting to wonder whether anybody else with an operational antispam and security role for a large provider was around here. :) Thanks for chiming in, vijay. At a guess those v6 /32s are all registered in Romania? --srs On Saturday, August 31, 2013, Vijay Eranti (✌ విజయ్ ఈరంటి) wrote: > i agree with suresh's assessment. > > Lately lot of spammers are getting /32 ipv6 assignments with their own > ASNs and having a nice run. > The ipv4 allotment is seriously broken in ripe - just having paperwork > with valid forms filled is good enough to allot what ever range the > spammers can ask. > > regards > vijay > > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Suresh Ramasubramanian < > ops.lists at gmail.com <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'ops.lists at gmail.com');>>wrote: > >> The lack of progress is simply because you have very few people who are >> in a security rather than IP admin or network ops role. Security as in for >> a seriously large provider. >> >> The other lack of progress - well, changing entrenched policies, or >> enforcing them beyond a point where the enforcer is reluctant to >> investigate (or is it "play police" according to the local meme) is as >> tough as it sounds. >> >> >> On Friday, July 5, 2013, Frank Gadegast wrote: >> >>> Sascha Luck wrote: >>> >>> TTBOMK, as long as policy requirements are fulfilled >>>> there is no mandate to revoke resources. >>>> >>> >>> Any spammer on this list (think so, simply because >>> of the lack of progress) ? >>> >>> * Im starting now a second carrier in renting all >>> the IPv4 addresses left in our allocation exclusively >>> to abusers and make a lot of money with it. >>> Just make offers now. * >>> >>> Will surely put a working abuse contact email address >>> in RIPEs db, that gets directed to /dev/null >>> and have a correct postal address somewhere on >>> a funny island ... >>> >>> And it looks like if nobody could ever do anything >>> against it. >>> >>> The current regulations are simply slippery as >>> an eel (like we say in Germany), no way >>> to catch anybody responsible. Again, ridicolous ... >>> >>> >>> Kind regards, Frank >>> -- >>> PHADE Software - PowerWeb http://www.powerweb.de >>> Inh. Dipl.-Inform. Frank Gadegast mailto:frank at powerweb.de >>> Schinkelstrasse 17 fon: +49 33200 52920 >>> 14558 Nuthetal OT Rehbruecke, Germany fax: +49 33200 52921 >>> ==============================**==============================** >>> ========== >>> >>> >> >> -- >> --srs (iPad) >> > > -- --srs (iPad) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20130831/0fe8579f/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Clarification Regarding Needs Assessment and Audits
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Clarification Regarding Needs Assessment and Audits
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]