I was starting to wonder whether anybody else with an operational antispam and security role for a large provider was around here. :)<br><br>Thanks for chiming in, vijay. At a guess those v6 /32s are all registered in Romania?<div>
<br></div><div>--srs</div><div><span></span><br>On Saturday, August 31, 2013, Vijay Eranti (✌ విజయ్ ఈరంటి) wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">i agree with suresh's assessment.<div><br><div>Lately lot of spammers are getting /32 ipv6 assignments with their own ASNs and having a nice run.</div></div><div>The ipv4 allotment is seriously broken in ripe - just having paperwork with valid forms filled is good enough to allot what ever range the spammers can ask.</div>
<div><br></div><div>regards</div><div>vijay</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Suresh Ramasubramanian <span dir="ltr"><<a href="javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'ops.lists@gmail.com');" target="_blank">ops.lists@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">The lack of progress is simply because you have very few people who are in a security rather than IP admin or network ops role. Security as in for a seriously large provider.<div>
<br></div><div>The other lack of progress - well, changing entrenched policies, or enforcing them beyond a point where the enforcer is reluctant to investigate (or is it "play police" according to the local meme) is as tough as it sounds.<div>
<div><span></span><br>
<br>On Friday, July 5, 2013, Frank Gadegast wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Sascha Luck wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
TTBOMK, as long as policy requirements are fulfilled<br>
there is no mandate to revoke resources.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Any spammer on this list (think so, simply because<br>
of the lack of progress) ?<br>
<br>
* Im starting now a second carrier in renting all<br>
the IPv4 addresses left in our allocation exclusively<br>
to abusers and make a lot of money with it.<br>
Just make offers now. *<br>
<br>
Will surely put a working abuse contact email address<br>
in RIPEs db, that gets directed to /dev/null<br>
and have a correct postal address somewhere on<br>
a funny island ...<br>
<br>
And it looks like if nobody could ever do anything<br>
against it.<br>
<br>
The current regulations are simply slippery as<br>
an eel (like we say in Germany), no way<br>
to catch anybody responsible. Again, ridicolous ...<br>
<br>
<br>
Kind regards, Frank<br>
--<br>
PHADE Software - PowerWeb <a href="http://www.powerweb.de" target="_blank">http://www.powerweb.de</a><br>
Inh. Dipl.-Inform. Frank Gadegast mailto:<a>frank@powerweb.de</a><br>
Schinkelstrasse 17 fon: <a href="tel:%2B49%2033200%2052920" value="+493320052920" target="_blank">+49 33200 52920</a><br>
14558 Nuthetal OT Rehbruecke, Germany fax: <a href="tel:%2B49%2033200%2052921" value="+493320052921" target="_blank">+49 33200 52921</a><br>
==============================<u></u>==============================<u></u>==========<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div></div></div><span><font color="#888888"><br><br>-- <br>--srs (iPad)<br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br></div>
</blockquote></div><br><br>-- <br>--srs (iPad)<br>