This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Enabling community self-help?
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Enabling community self-help?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Enabling community self-help?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Thu Mar 29 17:26:49 CEST 2012
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 8:32 PM, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote: > > *My* requirements are already met. *If* the legal authorities in a given > country convict the owners of a LIR, the RIPE NCC will take the resources > away. This is good enough for me, and this is how *law* works in the EU. > > You seem to require something else. This ignores, for example, that there are several jurisdictions where for various reasons a conviction is hard or impossible for reasons such as - All the illegal actions (whatever they are) are committed against citizens of other countries Inadequate laws in the country where the criminal is based Lack of mutual legal assistance etc treaties with a country where law enforcement is interested + has victims seeking redress Possible bribery of local police and judiciary by the criminals .. etc .. -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20120329/29e97219/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Enabling community self-help?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Enabling community self-help?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]