[anti-abuse-wg] National PSDN "UZPAK"

Hi Reza,

this issue is well known (see the list archive) and at the moment it is
my fault to not come up with a new policy proposal. Sorry 24 hours a day
is just to less ;-) I hope I'll get it done pretty soon, to have another
starting point for a discussion.

Stay tuned,

Tobias



Am 26.03.12 13:43, schrieb Reza Farzan:
> Florian,
> 
> If your statement--Email contact information is optional, is correct, how do
> people contact a network regarding the abuse violations that were originated
> from their IP address?
> By calling them? Or, writing a letter using the postal service? This is
> simply ridiculous.
> 
> Again, if your statement--Email contact information is optional, is true,
> RIPE must be stuck in the past, without realizing the necessity of e-mail
> contacts.
> 
> RIPE must create a revised policy regarding e-mail contact for networks
> listing within RIPE database to ensure accountability.
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> Reza Farzan 
> rezaf at mindspring.com
> 
> 
>  
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Florian Weimer [mailto:fw at deneb.enyo.de] 
>> Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2012 12:50 PM
>> To: rezaf at mindspring.com
>> Cc: 'Laura Cobley'; anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net
>> Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] National PSDN "UZPAK"
>>
>> * Reza Farzan:
>>
>>> What is the RIPE policy regarding listing contact e-mails, 
>> especially 
>>> about reporting abuse?
>>
>> Email contact information is optional.
> 
> 


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 307 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20120326/6fd1fa99/attachment.sig>