This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] National PSDN "UZPAK"
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] National PSDN "UZPAK"
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] National PSDN "UZPAK"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Chris
chrish at consol.net
Mon Mar 26 14:12:11 CEST 2012
Hi, On 03/26/2012 01:43 PM, Reza Farzan wrote: > RIPE must create a revised policy regarding e-mail contact for networks > listing within RIPE database to ensure accountability. Oh wow, now that you said so, RIPE (that would be the european+ internet - how much is that, a billion pepole?) has to subject themselves to your wisdom... ;) You can, ofc, try the obvious: mazgarov at uznet.net ripeadmin at uzpak.uz Then again, seeing your mailinglist-contributions I guess it's highly likely that your mails might be considered the same as the probable reason there's no email attributes: spam. In case of a serious issue you probably wouldn't have a problem with postal mail. And while we're at it, regarding your 'accountability'-thing: you should really talk to some governments, being from the past (well...) they all seem to tend to regard postal mail as more 'accountable' than email... Surprisingly... Regards, Chris
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] National PSDN "UZPAK"
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] National PSDN "UZPAK"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]