This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] National PSDN "UZPAK"
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] National PSDN "UZPAK"
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] National PSDN "UZPAK"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Fri Mar 30 04:13:54 CEST 2012
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 1:22 AM, Florian Weimer <fw at deneb.enyo.de> wrote: > > I've been through this---in the end, WHOIS accuracy has very little > impact on things. The data is bad because no one has a serios need > for it. Neither the anti-abuse folks, nor the copyright holders, and > certainly not law enforcement. Are you sure? http://www.icann.org/en/news/presentations/opta-mar-26jun06-en.pdf -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] National PSDN "UZPAK"
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] National PSDN "UZPAK"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]