This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] WhoisSecurity.com
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WhoisSecurity.com
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WhoisSecurity.com
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Brian Nisbet
brian.nisbet at heanet.ie
Mon Jun 4 11:26:34 CEST 2012
On 04/06/2012 02:46, lists at help.org wrote: > > we've asked the NCC to put in the work to fully explain the reasons > behind the current data protection procedures. This update, when > complete, will be posted on ripe.net and reported here. I have made no > comments against >your website, > > NCC already did that and they posted it at > http://www.ripe.net/data-tools/support/documentation/legal-framework-and-procedures-proposed-by-the-data-protection-task-force > > > It is worthless which is why i saw the need to put a site together. Plus > there is this issue where the whois data (including RIPE) is being > packaged and resold even though the banners say that should not be done. > When I bring this up to various whois operators they don't do anything. > So what is the point of the banners? What is the legal authority behind > them? This has gone of for years so I find it hard to believe that RIPE > is suddenly going to answer the question. Neustar brought in a privacy > officer after I complained about .us. CIRA (.ca) says it against their > AUP so I am waiting to hear back from them as well. Ok, one last time then. There were comments made on this list before the RIPE 64 meeting in regards to the information listed in the URL above. So, at that meeting, the NCC were asked to provide further information and far more details about the specific laws being followed. At this point I do not have a timeline for this response, but hopefully I'll be able to inform the list soon. > You came on here and posted a message that you would not participate in > my web site even though you did not do that when others posted web sites > on here. You are like the kid who brought a soccer ball to the > playground and then takes the ball home when things didn't go his way. No, you said that as you weren't always monitoring the list we would need to post any information to your website. I simply stated that as always we would report back to this list and I was not going to undertake to post the information directly to your website as well. I have not objected to you sharing your URL as I wouldn't object to anyone sharing a useful anti-abuse URL to this list. Brian.
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WhoisSecurity.com
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WhoisSecurity.com
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]