[anti-abuse-wg] WhoisSecurity.com

 > we've asked the NCC to put in the work to fully explain the reasons 
behind the current data protection procedures. This update, when 
complete, will be posted on ripe.net and reported here. I have made no 
comments against >your website,

NCC already did that and they posted it at
http://www.ripe.net/data-tools/support/documentation/legal-framework-and-procedures-proposed-by-the-data-protection-task-force

It is worthless which is why i saw the need to put a site together.  
Plus there is this issue where the whois data (including RIPE) is being 
packaged and resold even though the banners say that should not be 
done.  When I bring this up to various whois operators they don't do 
anything.  So what is the point of the banners?  What is the legal 
authority behind them?  This has gone of for years so I find it hard to 
believe that RIPE is suddenly going to answer the question.  Neustar 
brought in a privacy officer after I complained about .us.  CIRA (.ca) 
says it against their AUP so I am waiting to hear back from them as well.

You came on here and posted a message that you would not participate in 
my web site even though you did not do that when others posted web sites 
on here.  You are like the kid who brought a soccer ball to the 
playground and then takes the ball home when things didn't go his way.