[anti-abuse-wg] WhoisSecurity.com

To whom it may concern at Help.Org,

If you all think that writing such a meaningless e-mail and sending it anonymously will get you anywhere, you are sadly mistaken.

The "anti-abuse-wg" is an open forum where interested individuals discuss abuse related matters in connection with Whois directories. Everyone who participate in these discussions identifies himself/herself as a professional courtesy. 

By calling anti abuse issues "worthless", Help.Org staff who has sent this meaningless e-mail diminishes its credibility. 

By hiding behind "Help.Org" and "whoissecurity.com" domains, you show your unwillingness to engage in the ongoing discussions professionally here.

Reza Farzan

===============



-----Original Message-----
>From: "lists at help.org" <lists at help.org>
>Sent: Jun 1, 2012 11:18 AM
>To: anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net
>Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] WhoisSecurity.com
>
>While this list does not require introductions or anything of the 
>sort, it is always nice to at least have a name for a poster. Like I 
>said, it isn't required, but it might facilitate discussion if people 
>had some idea who they're talking >to, if that makes any sense? This is 
>especially useful when you're asking such a broad question.
>
>No, that does not make sense.  The site is compiling resources and the 
>name of the people compiling the resources is not relevant.  You just 
>want that information so you and people like Michele
>Neylon and Dominque Custers can attempt to ridicule the people 
>developing the site.  You guys do this to divert attention from the 
>misinformation being presented about this issue.
>
>The RIPE reports on this issue are worthless and the reasons are 
>explained at:
>
>http://whoissecurity.com/europeans-restrict-ip-address-whois-data/
>http://whoissecurity.com/historical-whois-data-and-privacy-laws/
>
>As for the whois scraping and the packaging and resale of whois data see
>
>http://whoissecurity.com/historical-whois-data-look-who-sells-it/
>
>So as you can see the issues are already researched to a certain extent 
>but I am sure things have been missed.
>
>Please use the form submission at the site since I do not monitor this 
>list all the time.