This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] abuse-contact is not going to fly unless we get all the legitimate players adopting it first
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] abuse-contact is not going to fly unless we get all the legitimate players adopting it first
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] abuse-contact is not going to fly unless we get all the legitimate players adopting it first
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Chris
chrish at consol.net
Wed Apr 25 10:59:50 CEST 2012
hi! On 04/25/2012 10:33 AM, Frank Gadegast wrote: > Surely you cannot force any member to work against abuse, but > we can improve the accuracy of the contacts of those, that > do like it. [...] > was really complicated and intense, it would be helpful, > if RIPE NCC would have a technical validation, simply > because they have better ways to contact their members, > and their members probably listen to RIPE NCC quicker > than to any complainant. i sense some dissonance here. anyway. if you wish to check objects for a form you don't like (like 'no optional email attribute') and subsequently inform the responsible person of what you think about your findings - i don't see what stops you. if you just walk up to me and tell me i have to do it for you - well: no, you can do that yourself. regards, Chris
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] abuse-contact is not going to fly unless we get all the legitimate players adopting it first
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] abuse-contact is not going to fly unless we get all the legitimate players adopting it first
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]