This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] abuse-contact is not going to fly unless we get all the legitimate players adopting it first
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] abuse-contact is not going to fly unless we get all the legitimate players adopting it first
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] abuse-contact is not going to fly unless we get all the legitimate players adopting it first
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Frank Gadegast
ripe-anti-spam-wg at powerweb.de
Wed Apr 25 11:13:56 CEST 2012
Chris wrote: > hi! Oh Chris ... > On 04/25/2012 10:33 AM, Frank Gadegast wrote: >> Surely you cannot force any member to work against abuse, but >> we can improve the accuracy of the contacts of those, that >> do like it. > [...] >> was really complicated and intense, it would be helpful, >> if RIPE NCC would have a technical validation, simply >> because they have better ways to contact their members, >> and their members probably listen to RIPE NCC quicker >> than to any complainant. > > i sense some dissonance here. Sure, because their mistake made it nearly impossible to reach them (remember: they finally DID update it, so they WANTED a working contact) anmd RIPE NCC and the new form were simply NO help at all. We accived the final contact of a peering contact we had (so: from a different source !) The current quality of the DB seems to depend on the abused ones instead of the publisher or the maintainer of the DB. I call this bananaware (getting ripe at the customer) ... The majority of the members DO like correct abuse contacts (at least to our expirience) and DO something against abuse from their networks, but surely make mistakes. Do you not think, that they would appriciate a system to raise the quality of their objects ? Well, I do. > anyway. > > if you wish to check objects for a form you don't like (like 'no optional email attribute') and subsequently inform the responsible person of what you think about your findings - i don't see what stops you. > if you just walk up to me and tell me i have to do it for you - well: no, you can do that yourself. Just in your case: I will fix your records to our needs, simply send me your maintainer password ;o) Kind regards, Frank > > regards, > > Chris > > > > > > -- > This message has been scanned by Kaspersky Anti-Virus. > For more information about data security please visit > http://www.kaspersky.com and http://www.viruslist.com -- Mit freundlichen Gruessen, -- MOTD: "have you enabled SSL on a website or mailbox today ?" -- PHADE Software - PowerWeb http://www.powerweb.de Inh. Dipl.-Inform. Frank Gadegast mailto:frank at powerweb.de Schinkelstrasse 17 fon: +49 33200 52920 14558 Nuthetal OT Rehbruecke, Germany fax: +49 33200 52921 ======================================================================
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] abuse-contact is not going to fly unless we get all the legitimate players adopting it first
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] abuse-contact is not going to fly unless we get all the legitimate players adopting it first
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]