[anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 8, Issue 9

Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> icann does use this measure against registrars, not too infrequently

and most domain registry also do ...

I would say, its common sense to validate email addresses in the
database of internet resources.

RIPE NCC is not doing this

Is there somebody from the other RIRs on this list ?
Are other RIRs validating the abuse email addresses ?


Kind regards, Frank

>
> --srs (iPad)
>
> On 11-Apr-2012, at 21:34, Frank Gadegast<ripe-anti-spam-wg at powerweb.de>  wrote:
>
>> If RIPE NCC finally will force the LIRs to have correct abuse
>> contacts, it means that the LIR has to take care (well he inserted
>> the objects himself or delegated access to them to his customer),
>> its not interesting, if the customer provides correct details at all.
>> The LIR has to provide them, there are only objects inherited from
>> the LIR.
>>
>> And if he doesnt, well, punish the LIR ...
>
>
>


-- 

Mit freundlichen Gruessen,
--
MOTD: "have you enabled SSL on a website or mailbox today ?"
--
PHADE Software - PowerWeb                       http://www.powerweb.de
Inh. Dipl.-Inform. Frank Gadegast             mailto:frank at powerweb.de
Schinkelstrasse 17                                fon: +49 33200 52920
14558 Nuthetal OT Rehbruecke, Germany             fax: +49 33200 52921
======================================================================