This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 8, Issue 9
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 8, Issue 9
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Analysis of the Legal Framework and Procedures Proposed by the Data Protection Task Force
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Peter Koch
pk at DENIC.DE
Fri Apr 13 10:06:07 CEST 2012
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 05:38:11PM +0200, Wout de Natris wrote: > 1. Primarily RIPE NCC needs or at least should need a proper overview of who its members are for several reasons that all have to do with internal processes like reaching out, billing and maintaining correct records, in short common business practice. yes, but let's please not confuse this with the RIPE database. -Peter
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 8, Issue 9
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Analysis of the Legal Framework and Procedures Proposed by the Data Protection Task Force
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]